Published Date : 6/25/2025Â
Australia's push for digital driver's licenses (mDLs) has sparked debate over the security of holograms and QR codes used to verify identities. Despite state guidance promoting these features as reliable, cybersecurity experts argue they are not true security measures. The issue highlights a growing concern about the vulnerabilities of digital IDs and the potential for fraud. n nNew South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, and Queensland have all launched mDLs, each with unique approaches to verification. NSW and Victoria emphasize visual checks, including holograms, while Queensland uses a pulsing government logo. However, these features are not foolproof. Dr. Vanessa Teague, an expert in cybersecurity, has criticized the reliance on holograms, stating they areÂ
Q: Are mDL holograms a reliable security feature?
A: No, cybersecurity experts like Dr. Vanessa Teague argue that holograms on mDLs are not a true security feature. They provide a false sense of security and do not ensure the integrity of digital IDs.
Q: Why do states use holograms if they’re not secure?
A: States like NSW, Victoria, and Queensland promote holograms for visual verification, but experts warn this approach lacks cryptographic security. The focus on visuals over QR codes or biometrics creates vulnerabilities.
Q: How can mDLs be verified securely?
A: The most reliable method is scanning the QR code, which links to a secure database. However, inconsistent implementation across states and lack of public scrutiny raise concerns about its effectiveness.
Q: What are the risks of fake mDLs?
A: Fakes are a growing problem, with businesses like bars in Victoria refusing to accept mDLs. The reliance on visual checks and lack of standardized protocols make it easy to forge digital IDs.
Q: What’s the future of mDLs in Australia?
A: New South Wales and South Australia are piloting verifiable photo credentials compliant with international standards. However, widespread adoption depends on addressing current security gaps and improving user education.Â