Australia's Public View on Facial Recognition Tech: Trust & Perception

Published Date: 30/07/2024

A recent survey reveals that Australians are open to facial recognition technology being used by police and healthcare providers, but are hesitant when it comes to private tech companies.

"A new report titled 'Australian Public Attitudes to Facial Recognition Technology' has shed light on the Australian public's understanding, experiences, and opinions regarding facial recognition technology (FRT). The survey, conducted by researchers from Monash University, Australian National University, and Deakin University, revealed a significant gap in public knowledge about FRT, despite widespread awareness of the term.

The majority of respondents reported having little knowledge about the technology, with only a minority indicating they knew 'a fair bit' or 'a lot', primarily those with computer science or IT backgrounds. However, support for FRT varies significantly depending on its application. A majority of respondents expressed support for using FRT for age verification in online gambling and pornography, as well as for accessing government services.

Experiences with FRT are most common in contexts such as unlocking smartphones and airport security. The public generally perceives FRT as accurate, with 58% considering it 'very accurate' or 'accurate', though concerns about misuse and privacy are prevalent.

Trust in institutions using FRT also varies, with the police and healthcare organizations being trusted the most, while retail outlets and tech companies like Google and Facebook are trusted the least. Public opposition is strongest against using FRT in workplaces for monitoring productivity and in retail outlets for personalized advertising.

The report highlights a strong demand for transparency and informed consent regarding FRT use. The public is hopeful about FRT's potential for improving safety and solving crimes, but remains concerned about privacy, data security, and potential misuse.

The report underscores the need for robust public education and deliberation on FRT, emphasizing the importance of developing informed consent models and clear regulatory frameworks. As the lead author of the report notes, there is an urgent need for better public education about the technology, and for legislation aimed at minimizing the risk of fostering 'an automated surveillance society' while attempting to reap the benefits of FRT."

FAQs:

"Q: What is the main focus of the report 'Australian Public Attitudes to Facial Recognition Technology'?

A: The report provides an analysis of the Australian public's understanding, experiences, and opinions regarding facial recognition technology (FRT)

Q: What percentage of respondents expressed support for using FRT for age verification in online gambling?

A: 61% of respondents expressed support for using FRT for age verification in online gambling

Q: Which institutions are trusted the most to use FRT responsibly?

A: The police and healthcare organizations are trusted the most, with 60% and 57% of respondents, respectively, expressing trust

Q: What is the public's main concern regarding FRT?

A: The public is concerned about privacy, data security, and potential misuse of FRT

Q: What is the need emphasized in the report?

A: The report emphasizes the need for robust public education and deliberation on FRT, as well as the development of informed consent models and clear regulatory frameworks"

Biometric Products & Solutions

BioEnable offers a wide range of cutting-edge biometric products and solutions: