Ghana Electoral Commission Can't Stop Biometric Procurement Inquiry

Published Date : 11/4/2025 

The Electoral Commission of Ghana (EC) has failed in its attempt to stop an investigation by the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) into procurement irregularities for a biometric election management system. 

The Electoral Commission of Ghana (EC) has faced a significant setback in its efforts to halt an investigation into procurement irregularities related to a biometric election management system. According to GhanaWeb, the EC’s attempt to discontinue the investigation by the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) has been unsuccessful.

The CHRAJ, a prominent human rights and administrative justice body in Ghana, has rejected the EC’s appeal to dismiss a petition filed by the think tank IMANI Africa. IMANI Africa had petitioned the EC in May last year, raising concerns over the decision to replace biometric registration and voter verification devices with a new contract. The think tank alleged that this decision wasted public funds and involved a lack of transparency, abuse of power, and potential financial loss amounting to millions of US dollars.

The EC had argued that CHRAJ lacked the legal jurisdiction to investigate the matter. However, CHRAJ’s ruling, which is published on IMANI’s website, clearly states that it has the authority to probe into the EC’s actions under Articles 218 and 287 of the 1992 Constitution. These articles empower CHRAJ to investigate matters related to human rights, justice, and the fight against corruption. CHRAJ also has the authority to refer the case to other state authorities if it detects potential criminal actions.

The ruling calls on the EC to cooperate fully in the investigation. The investigation will delve into various aspects, including the process for awarding the contract, the selection of bidders, and whether these processes met the regulatory requirements set by the law. It will also examine the procedures for disposing of the old devices and related data protection issues.

The EC has been embroiled in a series of controversies over the past few years, particularly concerning procurement breaches and the handling of public resources. This latest development highlights the ongoing challenges the commission faces in maintaining transparency and accountability in its operations.

The investigation by CHRAJ is expected to provide clarity on the allegations and help restore public trust in the electoral process. It is a crucial step in ensuring that the EC adheres to the highest standards of integrity and transparency, which are essential for the credibility of Ghana’s democratic institutions.

The ongoing investigation underscores the importance of robust oversight mechanisms in safeguarding public resources and ensuring that government agencies operate within the legal and ethical frameworks. As the case progresses, it will be closely monitored by the public and civil society organizations, who are keen to see the outcome and the measures taken to address any irregularities found. 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQS): 

Q: What is the main issue being investigated by CHRAJ?

A: CHRAJ is investigating procurement irregularities related to a biometric election management system, including the replacement of biometric registration and voter verification devices, which are alleged to have wasted public funds and involved a lack of transparency and abuse of power.

Q: Why did the Electoral Commission try to stop the investigation?

A: The Electoral Commission attempted to stop the investigation by arguing that CHRAJ lacked the legal jurisdiction to look into the matter. However, CHRAJ rejected this argument, stating that it has the authority to investigate under the 1992 Constitution.

Q: What are the potential consequences of the investigation?

A: The investigation could lead to the referral of the case to other state authorities if potential criminal actions are detected. It aims to ensure transparency and accountability in the Electoral Commission's operations and restore public trust in the electoral process.

Q: What is the role of IMANI Africa in this case?

A: IMANI Africa, a think tank, filed the petition with CHRAJ, alleging that the Electoral Commission's decision to replace biometric devices wasted public funds and involved a lack of transparency, abuse of power, and potential financial loss.

Q: How does this investigation impact Ghana's democratic institutions?

A: The investigation is crucial for ensuring that the Electoral Commission adheres to the highest standards of integrity and transparency. It helps in maintaining the credibility of Ghana's democratic institutions and public trust in the electoral process. 

More Related Topics :